August 23, 2019 HomeArticlesAmanda Knox Body Language Analysis Amanda Knox Body Language Analysis By Maxine Hayes Articles, Blog 67 Comments Tags:amanda knox, Amanda Knox 2018, Amanda Knox body language, Amanda Knox body language analysis, Amanda Knox documentary, Amanda Knox interview, Amanda Knox psychopath, and, Body Language Amanda Knox Cold Blooded, she, the Related Posts Can Cerakote Be Done At Home? WE DITCHED OUR VAN FOR A WEEK…for this! White Label — Travel Affiliate Program for Flights and Hotels About Author admin 67 Comments Mandy C Could you do a video on the McCanns. British couple whoClaim their child was abducted. In the father I see a lot of contempt, deception and lies. Many emotionless interviews/unusual body language. Like they are trying to control their reactions. Smirking-duping delight. I see constructing events instead of recalling the truth. Would like to see your professional opinionhttps://youtu.be/zzKS6HnTKOM April 17, 2019 Reply Marina Krsmanovic Guilty as f… April 17, 2019 Reply Monica Great explanation, as always 😉thank you April 17, 2019 Reply Michelle 68 Amanda e l altro detta in italiano è paraculata dall'America. . colpevole fino al midollo ma ascolto lo stesso 😐 April 17, 2019 Reply Cristina Cris Interesting as always. Good job coach.. I believed she was guilty before now after that I'm totally sure. Never ever liked her eyes above all. April 17, 2019 Reply Viviane Dim As someone who studied this case and particularly Amanda''s body lan gauge, I must say after listening 5 minutes of your analysis, that I'm not agree. I think you make the same mistake as many other made as well,taking expressions of her face not puting them in the context,forgetting that the murder happened almost 12 years ago when Amanda was only 21. Ill not try to convince you that I'm right.I know I am,Amanda is innocent, despite her confusing behavior. I would only suggest you to take a look on Rudyard Guede. Especially his interview with Italian journalist after his released of jail. April 18, 2019 Reply hyuck Oh, ricordo questo caso. L'ho seguito in tv/sui giornali ai tempi e pensavo fosse colpevole (e che Guede è stato incastrato in un qualche modo). Non ho mai guardato le sue interviste ma guardando questa devo dire: si è guadagnata il nickname di Foxy Knoxy per qualcosa.Kudos per lei comunque. Mi sarebbe piaciuto andare a vedere la convention di lei e Damien Echols. Concordo sul suo "No".. è molto italianizzato. Il primo suona più "nou" e il secondo è piu "no". Il suono è diverso. E sembra quasi che mette su una maschera per dire "no…credimi". April 18, 2019 Reply I am Somebody Hey! This person is really strange effectively 😅 her eyes are weird. As usual a very good analysis! It's a pleasure to watch your videos! April 18, 2019 Reply Lion of Zion SHE AS THE THOUSAND YARD STARE ! GUILTY ! April 18, 2019 Reply Tom Graham Amanda Knox was acquitted of the Murder of her flat-mate Meredith Kercher in 2015. On 24th January 2019 the ECtHR concluded that Amanda's human rights were violated in multiple instances during her interrogation of 5th-6th November 2007. The ECtHR concluded that these abuses "undermined the fairness of the proceedings as a whole". There is no evidence that Amanda Knox or Raffaele Sollecito had anything to do with death of Meredith Kercher. But let's not bother about that, let's play Mickey-Mouse pop-psychology parlour games to arrive at her guilt instead. Yes, there are still some individuals who can't let it go and still need to criminalise Amanda to satisfy their own self-righteousness, and to seize moral high ground at the expense of an innocent woman and her family. In this instance pop-psychology is weaponized and used to stalk and harass the victim. In this case we have a life-coach, of all people, who thinks he has the credentials to read minds. This is more of an unveiling of the arrogance of the author of the video than any confirmation of guilt of Amanda Knox. The expressions highlighted in the video show nothing more than an individual who is having to endure a stressful interview. The duper's delight and superiority that is referred to could be more appropriately attached to you Giovanni since you are arriving at Amanda's guilt by totally ignoring the facts of the case and by using a highly questionable methodology that can be neither proven nor disproven, arrogance indeed! What you are trying to attempt here can only be a means to an end and not an end in itself, and very questionable means at that. The problem is that none of this charade can be proven either, your conclusions are not supported by any evidence nor do they have any basis in fact, so it's got all the credibility of a trivial parlour game, nothing more. The bottom line is your analysis simply can't manifest pro-guilt evidence at the crime scene (where there is none), and has to be judged accordingly as a waste of time. If you do want to be even-handed in this matter Giovanni, why don't you upload a body language analysis of prosecutor Giuliano Mignini in the link below. He is responsible for the framing of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, the subsequent cover-up of his own incompetence along with that of police and the protection of the real, and only killer Rudy Guede. This will offer you a more authentic opportunity to practice your skills. My guess is you won't, though I'd like you to prove me wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbOjYpH1WdM&t=3212s April 18, 2019 Reply Amanda Serle Hi live coach, I always though Amanda knox was guilt she dusnt come across as a genuine person to me I'm afraid, she got away with murder🤗👌👍 April 20, 2019 Reply Tom Graham OK Giovanni if your theories are going to have any sustainability, you would have to authenticate them with a reasonable knowledge of what happened on the night Meredith was killed. Let's look at the facts that we know on the night of the murder. We have Rudy admitting that he was at the cottage at 8.30. At 8.40 we have Jovana Popovic visiting Raffale's flat where she Speaks to Amanda telling her that she no longer needs Raffaele to help pick up personal belongings for her. Amanda is in good spirits and invites Jovana inside but she declines. At 9.01 according to the CCTV footage we have Meredith arriving home to Via Della Pergola. At 9.26 We have Raffaele, at his flat, putting on a Naruto file on his laptop that runs for 20 minutes. What happens next? April 20, 2019 Reply Tom Graham Giovanni can you give me some source material on the "Soloman's Nod" that you refer to as well as this "superior smile" that you place so much importance to. I can't find anything in psychology. April 20, 2019 Reply Tom Graham 3:32 Giovanni you concluded that Amanda Knox was a psychopath and a whole load of other conclusions on the basis of still frame of a lop-sided smile? That's impossible! You have no right to come to these conclusions. The duper's delight and superiority complex are your characteristics Giovanni, not Amanda's. You will use this use this tactic throughout the rest of the video. 4:00 You have no right to suggest that Amanda is lying when she said that Meredith was someone that she "could get on with". The court testimony of her flat-mates and those who who knew them concluded that there was no animosity between them and that they were friends. 4:30 Again, you are implying that Amanda WAS jealous of Meredith without a shred of evidence to substantiate it. 4:54 No Giovanni, Amanda is not better, it's YOU WHO'S BETTER, with your superior ability to read people's minds even though there is no evidence to support your conclusions. After all who needs evidence when you've got such a gift, your narcissism is becoming more apparent Giovanni. 5:00 Wrong Giovanni, there is no evidence to support any instances of angry exchanges between Amanda and Meredith. 7:18 It bothers Amanda simply because she was friendly with Meredith. If you had read the court testimonies of her flatmates and their acquaintances you would know that there is no evidence to suggest otherwise. Amanda is nodding simply to assert that fact. 9:15 So Amanda is a narcissist and psychopath simply because she believed that Raffaele liked her. I'd understand your analysis if she was wrong, but she was correct. You are the one who is who is the narcissist Giovanni. 9:17 She loved the "notoriety" hmmm! Really, all Amanda wanted to do was study in Italy enjoy the experience. 10:11 Wrong! Giovanni Amanda was 20 while Raffaele was 23. A minor point but it's clear you haven't done any homework have you? 13:06 You are wrong about Amanda lying about the effects of marijuana, she goes on to describe a fairly typical effect of marijuana. What's the lie? 13:34 Amanda has stated multiple times prior to this interview, and in court that she was at Raffaele's flat on the night Meredith was killed. Amanda is merely reaffirming what she had asserted previously. Your point would only make sense if this was the first time she had been asked the question. So again Giovanni, you're psychobabbling. 15:41 If you had bothered to research the case you would know that there was a photograph circulating in the media that showed the sink after it had been sprayed with the forensic chemical phenolphthalien that produces a garish pink colour when it reacts with haemoglobin. This reaction was falsely passed off as blood in the tabloids. Amanda is quite correct to say that there were "just speckles" and the crime scene photographs prove it. 15:50 Wrong again Giovanni. When Amanda noticed the blood she didn't know Meredith was dead. She only found that out a few hours later. 17.55 She did call her Mom for support, what's wrong with that? 19:07 This is where your complete lack of knowledge of this case becomes obvious. When Meredith's body was found only her foot was visible from under the duvet. When Filomena screamed "a foot" it was bound to be confusing. What does the change of inflection, (which is hardly discernible) of Amanda's voice have to do with it? 20:25 Amanda was confronted with a stupid question "Do you think she suffered". To which Amanda replied impatiently "Of course she suffered she had her fucking throat cut". What does that tell us? 21:29 "Is this something you'd be talking about if you were actually innocent" WTF! She's responding to the interviewers question! 23:48 If you knew anything about the case you'd understand that she is correct in what she says. 25:34 Of course she's going to emphasise the point, what's so weird about that? She spent 4 years wrongly convicted with the assertion that she was there. 26:05 I don't see any gulp, I think you're dramatising trivia aren't you Giovanni? MY CONCLUSIONS ; I don't have any qualifications in psychology so I'll have to use plain and simple commonsense. First of all there is no crime scene evidence or sustainable narrative to confirm that Amanda had anything to do with the death of Meredith. The Marasca-Bruno Supreme Court motivation report confirms that fact. There is a considerable amount of trivia masquerading as importance in this analysis. Nearly all of the video is much ado about nothing, exaggerated out of proportion by someone who has a hidden agenda. I believe that Giovanni has an unexpressed hatred of Amanda Knox and is accusing her of superiority, psychopathy, and narcissism on the flimsiest of pretexts, all of which have no basis in fact. Instead, it is Giovanni who is demonstrating superiority and narcissism by pretending he has powers of perception that are beyond the rest of us. Virtually all of the video is a self-serving, pseudo-intellectual exercise in psychobabble, none of which is supported by any evidence. The beauty of his pop-psychology parlour game is that it can't be disproved, giving Giovanni a platform to disgorge tremendous amounts of drivel and not be answerable to any of it, letting him away with hypothetical murder and transferring it onto Amanda. That fact merely inflates Giovanni's sense of superiority and narcissism that he unwittingly transfers on to his victim. In other words his portrayal of Amanda Knox is merely a reflection of Giovanni in the mirror. Giovanni might not realise it but he is only one of a few self-centred pop-psychologists that have got off on the Amanda Knox body language bandwagon. In fact, Giovanni's ramblings come very late in the day, but he is one of the poorest of his kind. Giovanni passes himself off as a Life Coach. What he does in his private life is none of my business but I'd be very suspicious of Giovanni's supercilious attitude in evaluating the psychology of his prospective clientele. I've suggested to Giovanni that he delete the video and re-upload it when he is more informed of the evidence of this case, but to no avail. My guess is that Giovanni is in a quandary of what to do. It's easy! Just press delete and the nightmare of your own creation will all go away like a bad dream. April 20, 2019 Reply Khadija카디자 in 12:43 you said that people they sometimes do 1 to 2 second pause to collect their thoughts and make sure comes out correctly and people do that when they lie, but i wanna ask you could people do that ( the pause) to control their words for example a famous person want to be himself and speak from his heart but he do pauses to not speel smth that can be misunderstood? April 21, 2019 Reply Khadija카디자 and amanda "i think" based oh the contempt she showed and being cold blooded when she was talking about her friend murder i think she doesn't consider her as a dear friend to love her, if you said ( but people feel bad for other death people even if they don't know them) here i can say maybe she doesn't care ( when someone doesn't care about someone else , he don't love him + he have a cold heart) then he will not feel sad for you ( but this is just my opinion and it can be false) but i can't say she murdered her . April 21, 2019 Reply John Milton Amanda is beautiful inside and out April 22, 2019 Reply MICHAEL DAVIS Good job. She is lying for sure. Do Hillary next. April 22, 2019 Reply John Milton Amanda is so obviously genuine no matter what bs this moron tries to spew April 22, 2019 Reply John Milton Of course she is April 22, 2019 Reply John Milton Amanda is 100% innocent and you are a total fraud as Tom already pointed out!! April 22, 2019 Reply John Milton I know he knows Amanda is innocent and he knows your a fraud. He explained that in great detail and you did not have any response proving that you are a fraud. Why don't you delete the video as he suggested and tell everyone the truth – that Amanda Knox is completely innocent April 22, 2019 Reply John Milton Unbelievable that some idiot can put up a video totally ignoring the facts and the evidence overwhelmingly proving Amanda's innocence and say she nodded her head and stared too much at the interviewer so that proves she is guilty and a bunch of sheep go oh your right Giovanni. You nailed that one. Anyone that believes this farce is as stupid as the so called expert!! April 23, 2019 Reply Robert Bilenchi Mr Maccarrone, Please stop this nonsense. You are not an expert in body language. The expressions you are trying to analysis are typical of someone describing the situation she is describing and not the deceptiveness of the questioning situation she is in at the time of the interview. People express all types of body language all of the time and no one piece of body language can be accurately analyzed in the way that you are applying to Amanda. Something else you are doing is neglecting the absolute total incompetence of the investigation and the prosecuting investigator. This is why she was eventually acquitted. Remember she is innocent. So why should she be exhibiting deceptive behavior. In short you are an incompetent ass. April 25, 2019 Reply Roy Bassa Please do analyze on Obama or Hillary May 1, 2019 Reply Elisabeth Bathory dirty, degenerated prostitute. that s all avout debil knox May 2, 2019 Reply Los Angels she is innocent May 9, 2019 Reply John Milton Amanda Knox is a hot piece of ass May 12, 2019 Reply Pete Edwards I could care less about her body language, no one looking that good could be guilty! Not to mention zero evidence against her! May 12, 2019 Reply Rebecca Weinstein You don't take out newly pierced earrings… lie ! May 15, 2019 Reply Ico 365 Never mind they have the convicted killer. May 20, 2019 Reply Hugo Brown She also looked away in the last bit. She doesn't appear totally innocent. She's definitely hiding some of the story. She may not have a killed Meredith. But she knows a lot more than she is telling. May 28, 2019 Reply Petitmomon I’m italian.. i confirm the second “no” sounds like an italian would say it June 3, 2019 Reply Stevie Love Meredith *KuRtcher. Jesus, he says KUH-Cher like 79 times. June 6, 2019 Reply ShaLa48 RollTide I have no clue. This one is very hard to read. Great video analysis. You rock. June 8, 2019 Reply hamudi allah She is guilty. Always felt it. June 10, 2019 Reply Phillip Y She just doesn't give me the sense that she is being honest, I just don't feel comfortable with her June 11, 2019 Reply Phillip Y Jodi Arias did a headstand. Maybe something in common? June 11, 2019 Reply Winter Song I think she's guilty, she just seems fake and with a cold look in her eyes. June 12, 2019 Reply Ninchennase Your reading seems biased to me. I got the impression that you weren't analyzing her but looking for signs that support your theory that she's guilty. It seemed there was nothing she could do that didn't prove her guilt. That was kind of weird. I'm not sure whether I think she was involved or not but I felt your "reading" wasn't one. It was ticking off a list of possible signs, some of which rather clichéd, and never taking into account an individual's personality, experience and how they were connected to the case or victim. Watching videos like this one, I see why body reading isn't evidence in court. It's not scientific. It's all interpretation, and that's always biased. So I'll stick to hard evidence when I form opinions on cases. June 12, 2019 Reply w y 1000000000000% GUILTY and if you can't see it, God help you. Acquitted? This world is unfair 🙁 June 13, 2019 Reply w y Tom, Pete, and John have gone to SIGNIFICANT lengths to try to prove Amanda's innocence. Either they are all Amanda herself, hired by her, or complete morons. Study body language like I have and you will know that Giovanni is spot on. I bet you believed OJ was innocent too, LMAO. Don't be fooled by beauty, she is clearly 100% guilty. Unfortunately, only the studied will see it. Giovanni, pay no mind to the trolls. Keep up the fantastic work! June 13, 2019 Reply hamudi allah New conspiracy: Tom Graham (comment section) is amanda knox. 🤗 He/She is trying way too hard to defend Amanda. June 13, 2019 Reply Adriana She is a psychopath. June 14, 2019 Reply Susan Barranco HER EYES ARE THE WINDOW TO HER SOUL.SHE IS GUILTY. June 14, 2019 Reply Lara Chaulin I'm from Italy and let me tell you that almost every Italian hates her. She is definitely hiding something. June 15, 2019 Reply Inori Blossom She was a nymphomaniac. June 17, 2019 Reply vvv 02:16 this sort of smile is called a smirk and AK smirks a lot. A smirk is an insolent contemptful smile on the edge of the mouth (one side only) June 17, 2019 Reply vvv 12:23 OK, you said she seems genuine but she looks down on the side, like mentally "reading" or watching something from a distance or rehearsing ( a film she has mentally created). That's what I see at least. Also looking down on the side while "telling" a story sends a message of "angélisme" (in French) . It's has a securing effect on the the listener. Excellent manipulation practice. Works a lot ! June 17, 2019 Reply vvv 20:16 this breath can be interpreted in various ways but I see/hear someone who is annoyed by getting this question asked. Also, she has a way to close her eyes when she is stating something that should be perceived as important to hear. It's a good technique, because closing eyes is a way to comfort the listerner again. (that's how I see it ) June 17, 2019 Reply vvv 22:15 she's frowning. question is annoying to her. And it's a typical answer to avoid the answer : everyone is different, everyone feels differently, taste and colours vary etc… this is called a "lieu commun " in French , in English it's called a truism : "A truism is a claim that is so obvious or self-evident as to be hardly worth mentioning, except as a reminder or as a rhetorical or literary device (…).." (sorry took it from wkpdia) Truism is widely used by manipulators. June 17, 2019 Reply vvv It is extremely difficult to say if she is guilty or not just by her body language because indeed (in my case) I read a lot of falseness. But the hard part is to interpret this falseness as a sign of guilt or as a sign of lack of compassion. Some people lack compassion but realise they are in a situation where they are supposed to show emotion. Because they know the "codes", so they need to "act" in a way. But you cannot "act" in real life like in a movie. This is what AK does and this is very misleading. So indeed, she could simply be guilty of something or she could be totally indifferent. On the other hand, it is quite obvious she appreciates this attention. Therefore I would opt for narcissism. And narcissism goes together with lack of empathy. And lack of empathy may lead to crime too. Now what I find interesting to analyse or understand is why people read her differently. It seems that some people (especially in the US) are very comfortable with the "acting" behavior. Why are Europeans (for instance) less prone to be influenced? That's my question. June 17, 2019 Reply Thomas Jones A Billion Percent Guilty, Fact, June 18, 2019 Reply Mara Costanza http://truejustice.org/ee/documents/perugia/amanda-knox-admits-staging-burglary.html June 22, 2019 Reply Mara Costanza In the sentence Bruno / Marasca it is written that the presence of Amanda Knox in the house of the crime * is proven at the time of the murder *. There is no doubt, for the cassation, that Knox is present when Meredith is killed. There can be no doubt, because the sentence specifies that the facts took place just as described "on the basis of Knox's own statements" when she said she had covered her ears so as not to hear the victim's excruciating scream. The judges also stress that they share Nencini's conclusion that this part of Knox's story describes real facts. These facts refer to the time of the murder. Bruno & Marasca are telling us that Knox was present at the murder. Then, they also add to the dose, remembering that Knox was aware of details of the murder that only those who were present at that moment could know, before the police learned of it (she was the first person to report a sexual assault, the first to report the scream, etc.).And finally, the sentence also says that Knox was aware of the fact that Lumumba was innocent precisely because she knew who he was. They also remind us that Knox is a liar and no possible ruling by the Strasbourg Court can ever tarnish the evidence of her guilt for the crime of slander, because she committed this crime with prolonged and repeated behavior in multiple ways and in multiple contexts.This is what the sentence says. He also says a couple more things.He says that it is an incontrovertible fact that Meredith was physically killed by several people while they were holding her, and that Guede would never have been able to commit that crime alone (pp.25-26). He also says that the simulation of theft with broken glass was a "staging"; and says that a robbery ended in murder would be an even illogical scenario, even if only to be hypothesized, because the dynamics of the murder would be inconsistent with the motive.Finally, he also informs us that Knox has washed Meredith's blood on her hands. This is what is written in the sentence June 22, 2019 Reply holyromanemperor Innocent lol June 25, 2019 Reply Sean Boyce PSYCHOPATHS ARE BORN SOCIOPATHS ARE MADE SHES BOTH THIS GIRL IS EVIL ITS PART OF HER PSYCHOPATHY HER THOUGHT PROCESS IS THIS DEFENSE MECHANISM SHE HAS THAT THE BAD GUYS ARE OUT THERE GO GET THEM. HER NARCISSIST PERSONALITY SHE WILL NEVER ADMIT ANYTHING. SHES THE EPITOME OF EVIL. FUNNY SHE HAS MOST OF AMERICA FOOLED AND PLAYING THEM WITH HER CROCODILE TEARS. I SAID YEARS SHE CRAVES THE ATTENTION ITS PART OF HER PSYCHOPATHY . SHE GOES BACK TO ITALY TO SPITE MEREDITHS FAMILY. NOW SHES GOT BRASS BALLS TO POST ON EVERY WEBSITE TO GET ALL THESE POOR AMERICAN SAPS TO PAY FOR HER WEDDING. HEY AMANDA ? HOW ABOUT DONATING THAT TO MEREDITH FAMILY!! YOU MADE 650,000 OFF STORY. KARMA IS A BITCH. July 22, 2019 Reply Glenn she eerily has the same PERSONALITY type of this person – Jodi Ann Arias – they are cut from the same cloth July 24, 2019 Reply Glenn she is definitely WEIRD – there is something just "not right" about her personality – she is NOT telling the (full) truth – she is HIDING something July 24, 2019 Reply Glenn SHE REMINDS ME OF JODI ARIAS – THE EXACT SAME PERSONALITY TYPE – COMPLETELY VACUOUS RUNNING ON AUTOPILOT WITHOUT A MORAL COMPASS – WEIRD – A VERY SCARY PERSON – SHE IS HIDING THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED TO MEREDITH KERCHER – SHE KNOWS BECAUSE SHE WAS THERE AND PARTICIPATED IN SOME CAPACITY July 24, 2019 Reply Sandman Of course she murdered Meredith. July 25, 2019 Reply Jkl Asd I love and really miss your analysis videos because it has real value.. July 29, 2019 Reply Tania If you are going to watch this video…I strongly suggest you watch this 14 mins video first.The video is of Joe Navarro former FBI body language expert.https://youtu.be/4jwUXV4QaTw July 30, 2019 Reply Alany Gadelha So, actually, you’re saying that the fact that she smiled is proving that she is guilty? What? Sometimes we smile ironically at circumstances where we think that what we’re listening is something absurd, for exemple, Michael Jackson when he was asked about the accusation of arresting the kid, he smiled and closed his eyes because he was angry and he couldn’t believe what he was listening and all that was happening to him, and? Recently the kid said the he was lying so Michael was saying the truth, that’s why you need to analyze in context, bc a smile doesn’t prove anything August 4, 2019 Reply Holly Huston WARNING: THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE ALL MADE BY GOOGLE AND YOUTUBE TRAINED EXPERTS IN CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY. THE AMOUNT OF CORRECT AND USEFUL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS VIDEO, WHICH IS ALSO MADE BY A NOT VERY WELL SPOKEN, SELF-TRAINED, DOCTOR OF FORENSIC BODY LANGUAGE IS NON-EXISTENT. PLEASE LISTEN TO THIS DELUSIONAL "LIFECOACH" MAKE A TOTAL ASS OF HIMSELF AS HE PULLS THEORIES OUT OF HIS SPECULATIVE AND UNEDUCATED ASS. IT IS ARMCHAIR PSYCHOLOGY AT ITS BEST!EYES ROLL OUT OF HEAD, HITCH HIKE TO CALIFORNIA AND ROLL INTO THE PACIFIC OCEAN August 6, 2019 Reply marsche jenkins Well once I came home & my door open,, I know forsure I'm screaming my roommate name out name… She took a shower & left never checking on the roommate that's her friend?! August 11, 2019 Reply lorraine aylward So before the police finish their investigation, while Amanda is in the police station, she tells people Meredith had her throat slit. How did Amanda know the manner of Meredith's death?. Guilty AF August 23, 2019 Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment:*Name:* Email Address:* Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.